Affiliate Disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you purchase through them, we may earn a small commission — at no extra cost to you. These recommendations are independent and based on our own research.
- ElevenLabs vs. Murf vs. Play.ht 2026: The Voice Cloning Test
- AI Speech Recognition — everything you need to know
- AI Dubbing for YouTube Channels 2026: Workflow, Tools and Legal Pitfalls
- AI Music Generation 2026: Suno, Udio and Stable Audio in the Producer Workflow
- ElevenLabs vs. Murf vs. Play.ht 2026: Which TTS AI for which job?
- Suno vs. Udio 2026: Which AI music platform for which job?
The meeting-transcription dilemma
AI makes meeting transcripts plug-and-play — but Germany has strict rules. §201 StGB makes covert word recording a criminal offense. GDPR demands consent plus a legal basis. Telecommunications secrecy protects the communication. And since the EU AI Act took full effect in early 2026, transcription tools used in HR, legal, financial, or medical contexts now fall under additional risk-assessment obligations.
At the same time, the productivity gain is huge: a team with 15 meetings a week saves roughly 12 hours of minutes-writing through AI transcription and auto-summaries. That is around €600 at a typical €50/hour knowledge-worker rate, every single week. Over a year, a mid-sized team can easily free up two full working months just by pushing minute-taking to a model. The catch is that a single compliance misstep — a leaked audio file, a US-hosted tool without a valid EU data-residency clause, a covertly recorded customer call — can wipe out two years of productivity gains in legal fees alone.
This guide shows the legally safe setup for small and medium businesses in 2026: which tools meet the current GDPR and AI Act bar, how to structure your Data Processing Agreements so that your audio is never silently recycled as training data, and how to run a defensible rollout without turning your IT department into a full-time privacy law firm.
Short answer
GDPR-compliant AI transcription in 2026: what SMBs actually need
Two years ago, the main question was whether you could use Whisper or Otter at all. In 2026 that debate is settled — you can, provided you pick the right tier and paper it correctly. What changed is the bar. Supervisory authorities in Germany, Austria, the Netherlands and France published a joint statement in February 2026 clarifying that any voice recording containing employee or customer speech is personal data under Article 4(1) GDPR, and that transcription counts as automated processing regardless of whether a human later edits the transcript. That removed the last grey zone.
For an SMB this means three practical things. First, the legal basis for the processing has to be documented before the first recording, not retroactively. Second, every cloud tool in the chain needs a written DPA that includes a clear “no training” clause and an exportable record of which sub-processors touch the audio. Third, if your meetings involve anything that could influence someone’s employment, creditworthiness, legal standing, or medical care, you need a Data Protection Impact Assessment on file. None of these steps are exotic — they are standard privacy hygiene — but skipping them is what turns a routine tool rollout into a six-figure finding during the next audit.
The good news: the toolset that meets this bar got significantly better over the last twelve months. Whisper v3 Turbo now runs three to five times faster than its predecessor on the same hardware, EU-hosted APIs have caught up in accuracy, and US providers have finally started offering contractual EU data residency rather than just “European servers” in marketing copy. The rest of this guide translates that landscape into concrete choices.
GDPR core requirements for voice audio processing
Voice is personal data. A two-minute recording of a sales call reveals identity, language, dialect, health markers in the voice, sometimes location from background noise, and the full content of whatever is said. That is why Article 9 GDPR may even apply if the conversation touches on health, union membership, religion, or political opinion — in which case you need explicit consent, not just a legitimate-interest balancing test.
For ordinary business meetings the baseline obligations are four. Lawful basis: usually either consent (Art. 6(1)(a)) or legitimate interest (Art. 6(1)(f)) for internal efficiency, documented in a short balancing memo. Purpose limitation: the audio is transcribed to produce minutes, not to train a model, not to score employee sentiment, not to feed a CRM without a separate basis. Data minimisation: the raw audio is deleted as soon as the transcript is signed off, typically within 30 days. Storage limitation: the transcript itself is retained only as long as necessary for the business purpose, often one to three months, and longer only where a statutory retention period (for example in banking or healthcare) requires it.
On top of that sit the procedural duties. The processing has to appear in your Article 30 record of processing activities with a short description, legal basis, retention period, and list of recipients. Employees must be informed in the privacy notice. External participants (customers, suppliers, candidates) need information before the meeting — ideally in the calendar invite or in an email preceding the call. If anything goes wrong — a leaked transcript, a misrouted audio file — you have 72 hours to notify the supervisory authority under Article 33.
None of this requires a privacy department. But it does require writing things down once and keeping the documents somewhere findable. Skipping the paper trail is what makes a minor incident escalate into a fine.
Data Processing Agreement (DPA): the standard document and its pitfalls
Every cloud transcription tool you use is a processor under GDPR, which means you need a DPA under Article 28 before you send them a single second of audio. Most vendors publish a standard DPA on their legal page; you countersign electronically and keep a copy. That covers the basics, but in 2026 the standard template has three recurring pitfalls you need to close.
The training clause. Many US vendors still reserve the right, often in a side document rather than the DPA itself, to use “de-identified” customer audio for model improvement. De-identified audio is not anonymous — voice prints and content are inherently re-identifiable. Require a written “no use of customer data for training, fine-tuning, or evaluation” clause. If the vendor refuses, walk away.
The sub-processor list. The standard DPA usually references a URL with the current sub-processors. Check it. A transcription provider that silently routes audio through a US-based CDN, a US-hosted speech-diarisation service, or an analytics vendor based outside the EEA exposes you to the same transfer problems as using a US tool directly. You want the full chain on EU soil, or covered by appropriate safeguards (Standard Contractual Clauses plus a Transfer Impact Assessment).
The data-residency clause. “European servers” in marketing is not a contractual commitment. You need a specific clause naming the country or region — for example “all customer audio and transcripts are stored and processed exclusively within the European Economic Area, primarily in Frankfurt, Germany” — plus a notification obligation if the vendor ever wants to change that. Without it, a future infrastructure migration can invalidate your whole compliance story overnight.
Keep the signed DPA, the sub-processor list as of signature date, and a short note on why this vendor was chosen over alternatives in a single folder per tool. Auditors and data protection authorities both ask for exactly this bundle, and having it ready shortens any inquiry from weeks to hours.
EU AI Act for transcription tools: what changed in 2026
The EU AI Act came into full force on 2 February 2026, and it reshapes the compliance picture for transcription in two specific ways. The first is transparency. Any AI system that generates or manipulates text from voice must clearly disclose that the output was produced by AI. In practice this means your transcripts need a short header — “Transcript generated by an automated speech-recognition system; please verify before use” — and your consent notice has to mention that AI will be used, not just that a recording will be made.
The second and more consequential change is the risk classification. General business transcription is low or minimal risk and largely unaffected. But the moment a transcript feeds into a decision that touches employment, creditworthiness, access to essential services, education, law enforcement, or healthcare, the use case shifts into the “high risk” tier. That triggers the full high-risk regime: a documented risk management system, data governance requirements, human oversight, logging, accuracy and robustness testing, and — most importantly for SMBs — a Data Protection Impact Assessment before go-live.
Concretely, this covers more SMB scenarios than it first appears. Transcribing interview calls to generate hiring summaries is high-risk. Transcribing therapy sessions, medical consultations, or occupational-health calls is high-risk. Transcribing disciplinary meetings or performance reviews is high-risk. Transcribing sales calls with retail customers where creditworthiness is discussed can be high-risk depending on the downstream use. Transcribing a weekly engineering standup is not.
The practical test: if a person could be materially disadvantaged by the transcript or the summary produced from it, treat it as high-risk, document a DPIA, and make sure a human reviews the output before any decision is made. If the transcript is just for your own memory or team coordination, the baseline GDPR obligations are enough.
Whisper v3 Turbo locally: the most GDPR-friendly solution
Running Whisper v3 Turbo on your own hardware is still the cleanest answer to most GDPR questions, simply because no data leaves the machine. No DPA, no sub-processor chain, no transfer risk, no training concern. The trade-off is that you manage the infrastructure yourself, but in 2026 that workload is genuinely small for an SMB.
On Mac (M1/M2/M3/M4)
# Install Homebrew (if not already)
/bin/bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/HEAD/install.sh)"
# Whisper.cpp (optimized for Apple Silicon)
brew install whisper-cpp
# Download the v3 Turbo model (one-off, ~1.5 GB)
whisper-cpp download large-v3-turbo
# Transcribe audio
whisper-cpp -m large-v3-turbo -l de /path/to/audio.mp3On an M2 Pro, a 60-minute meeting now transcribes in around four to six minutes with v3 Turbo — roughly three times faster than the old large-v3 model, with accuracy within one percentage point. On an M4 Max, you are looking at near-real-time for a single stream. That has flipped the calculus for a lot of SMBs: local is no longer the “slower but safer” option, it is simply faster for most workloads.
On Windows or Linux
pip install --upgrade openai-whisper
whisper audio.mp3 --model large-v3-turbo --language de --output_format txtOn an NVIDIA RTX 4070 or newer, enable --device cuda --compute_type float16 for a further speed bump. On older hardware, WhisperX (a community fork) adds diarisation and timestamps and is often a better pick than base Whisper.
Performance tips for v3 Turbo in 2026
A few things are worth knowing before you commit to a local workflow at scale. Turbo drops a chunk of the encoder depth compared to large-v3, which is where the speed gain comes from; accuracy on clean German speech stays within 1–2 percentage points, but on heavy dialect or very noisy recordings it is closer to 3–4 points behind large-v3. If you transcribe a lot of Bavarian or Saxon dialect, benchmark both models on your own material before deciding.
Batch processing matters more than raw model choice. Running five meetings through Whisper in parallel using faster-whisper with a batch size of four on a single GPU routinely doubles throughput versus running them sequentially. For a team of ten with two meetings a day per person, a single RTX 4070 workstation in the office cupboard can handle the entire workload overnight.
Voice activity detection (VAD) is the single biggest quality lever for noisy recordings. Enable Silero VAD in your pipeline and you cut hallucinated text on silent passages by roughly 70 percent — a well-known Whisper failure mode where the model “fills in” plausible-sounding nonsense during long pauses.
Mini web UI for the team
Fifty lines of Python plus Flask gets you an internal upload page where anyone on the team can drop a recording and collect a transcript. If that feels too DIY, the open-source project Speaches (EU-developed, MIT-licensed) wraps Whisper in a full web UI with user accounts, folders, and an OpenAI-compatible API, and it runs entirely in your Docker network.
EU-hosted API alternatives: Aleph Alpha, Nota AI, DeepL Write
Not every SMB wants to run GPUs. For those cases, EU-hosted APIs have become a viable middle ground — they keep the compliance story simple (processor in the EEA, one DPA, one sub-processor list) and offload the infrastructure work.
Aleph Alpha (Heidelberg, Germany) offers a transcription endpoint on top of their speech model, hosted in German data centres. Pricing as of May 2026 sits around €0.012 per minute for standard quality and €0.018 for their speaker-diarisation tier. Accuracy on German is on par with Whisper v3 Turbo and slightly ahead on domain-specific vocabulary when you use their custom-vocabulary feature. The DPA is clean, no-training is the default, and sub-processors are all EU-based.
Nota AI (Munich, Germany) is the transcription-focused alternative, popular with media and research customers. Their API runs on EU infrastructure with explicit Frankfurt residency, pricing starts around €0.008 per minute, and they offer a self-hostable on-premise option for regulated customers. Accuracy matches Whisper, and their editor includes native German redaction features.
DeepL Write + Voice (Cologne, Germany) extends DeepL’s text toolchain with a speech-to-text component launched in late 2025. Transcription is bundled into the DeepL Pro subscription that many SMBs already have, which keeps procurement simple. Data residency is EU by contract, and DeepL’s privacy posture is already familiar to most procurement teams. Accuracy is strong for business German but lags behind Aleph Alpha and Nota AI on heavy dialect.
Picking between them is usually a question of existing contracts and workflow. If you already buy DeepL Pro, starting there costs nothing extra. If you need speaker diarisation and a polished editor, Nota AI is the most refined product. If you care about on-prem or sovereignty framing for public-sector customers, Aleph Alpha is often the right political choice even when Nota AI would be technically equivalent.
US providers with EU data residency: Otter.ai, AssemblyAI, OpenAI
US tools are not categorically off-limits in 2026, but the bar is higher than it was two years ago. The Data Privacy Framework between the EU and the US is in place, which restores a legal basis for transatlantic transfers for certified companies, but supervisory authorities still expect you to prefer EU-hosted processing where it is available and reasonable.
Otter.ai offers an Enterprise plan with contractual EU data residency since mid-2025. On lower tiers, audio and transcripts are processed in the US; only the Enterprise tier gives you the residency clause and the full DPA with a no-training commitment. For an SMB, the Enterprise price point (around $30 per user per month, minimum 20 seats) often tips the calculation toward an EU-native alternative — unless Otter’s live-share and collaboration features are genuinely core to your workflow.
AssemblyAI deployed a Frankfurt data centre in February 2026, and their EU tier now keeps audio, transcripts, and metadata inside the EEA by contract. Pricing sits at about $0.37 per hour ($0.006 per minute) for their best model, which is competitive with EU-only providers. The DPA is solid and includes a clear no-training commitment. For developer-heavy teams building their own tooling, AssemblyAI is currently the strongest US-origin option from a compliance standpoint.
OpenAI’s Whisper API is available through their European data zone since early 2026, with residency pinned to Dublin and Frankfurt. That solves the transfer question on paper, but many German SMBs still run into internal policies that prohibit US-headquartered processors for voice data specifically. If you are in that camp, skip straight to Aleph Alpha or Nota AI.
Fireflies and tl;dv are popular among smaller teams. Both offer DPAs and have taken steps on EU residency, but the contractual language is weaker than AssemblyAI’s and the sub-processor chains are longer. Usable for low-sensitivity meetings, risky for anything touching HR, finance, or customer data.
A simple rule of thumb: for every US tool, check whether the EU-data-residency clause is in the contract you actually signed — not in a blog post, not in a support article. If it is not in the DPA or a named annex, you do not have it.
The 7 most common GDPR mistakes in AI transcription
After reviewing dozens of SMB rollouts in 2025 and early 2026, the same seven mistakes keep showing up. None of them are exotic. All of them are avoidable.
One: covert recording. Someone in the team turns on Otter during a customer call without asking. This is a criminal offence under §201 StGB, independent of any GDPR consequences. Disable auto-join on external calls in every tool’s admin panel, and put one sentence in your acceptable-use policy prohibiting it.
Two: treating legitimate interest as a blanket permission. Legitimate interest (Art. 6(1)(f)) can cover internal efficiency meetings, but it does not cover customer calls, HR meetings, or anything involving sensitive data. For those, you need consent or another specific basis, and you need to document why.
Three: missing DPAs for sub-processors. Your transcription vendor has a DPA, but the vendor’s speaker-diarisation supplier, analytics provider, or storage backend does not. You are responsible for the whole chain. Pull the sub-processor list once a quarter and spot-check that each entity is covered.
Four: keeping raw audio indefinitely. The transcript is what you need for minutes. The audio is a risk asset. Delete it within 30 days by default, with a documented exception process for specific retention needs.
Five: no retention schedule. Transcripts pile up in shared drives for years. Article 5(1)(e) GDPR requires you to delete data when you no longer need it. Set a default retention (one to three months for internal meetings, up to seven years for regulated sectors) and automate the deletion.
Six: forgetting the employee information obligation. Employees need to know that transcription is happening, on what legal basis, and what rights they have. A single paragraph in the privacy notice, distributed once and referenced in onboarding, is usually enough.
Seven: no DPIA for high-risk use cases. HR interviews, performance reviews, medical or legal consultations all need a DPIA under both GDPR Art. 35 and the AI Act’s high-risk regime. Skipping the DPIA is the finding that turns a routine audit into a serious one.
Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA): template for transcription use cases
A DPIA for transcription does not need to be a 40-page document. A three-to-five page memo that honestly answers seven questions is enough for most SMB use cases and will stand up in an audit.
The seven questions: What are we doing? (Description of the processing: who records, what gets transcribed, which tool is used, where the data flows.) Why are we doing it? (Business purpose and legal basis under Art. 6 and — if relevant — Art. 9.) Whose data is processed? (Employees, customers, third parties; number of people affected.) What risks does this create? (Unauthorised access, misuse of transcripts, re-identification, discrimination from summary outputs, scope creep into training data.) How likely and how severe are those risks? (Simple three-by-three matrix is plenty.) What controls reduce them? (Tool choice, consent flow, retention, access controls, DPA clauses, human review, training of staff.) What is the residual risk? (After controls, is the residual risk acceptable? If not, what additional steps or supervisory-authority consultation is needed?)
Write it once per tool and use case. Review it annually or when the tool materially changes. Keep it in the same folder as the DPA and the consent templates. If a supervisory authority ever asks, you hand them the folder and the conversation ends there.
Workflow: GDPR-compliant meeting transcription in 6 steps
A clean end-to-end workflow for a routine internal meeting looks like this.
Step one: invite with notice. The calendar invite includes a short recording notice with the legal basis, retention period, and opt-out instruction. Participants know what is happening before they walk into the room.
Step two: verbal reminder at the start. The meeting owner spends ten seconds confirming the recording and asking whether anyone objects. Objections stop the recording — no exceptions, no discussion.
Step three: record and upload. Audio goes into Whisper locally or to an EU-hosted API. No tool outside the approved list, no personal accounts, no detours through a US meeting-assistant that was not vetted.
Step four: human review. The transcript gets a quick human pass before it is shared. This catches transcription errors and, in higher-risk use cases, satisfies the AI Act’s human-oversight requirement. The reviewer also redacts anything sensitive that does not belong in the minutes.
Step five: distribute and file. Minutes go to participants and into the agreed folder with the retention tag applied. Raw audio is deleted automatically 30 days later.
Step six: periodic review. Once a quarter, someone spot-checks the retention automation, reviews the sub-processor lists, and confirms that nothing has drifted. Ten minutes, logged, done.
Cost: local Whisper instance vs EU-hosted API
The honest comparison depends on volume. For a team doing 5 hours of meetings per week (roughly 20 hours per month), an EU-hosted API at €0.01 per minute costs about €12 per month. That is almost free. No hardware, no setup, no maintenance.
For 20 hours per week (80 hours per month, realistic for a 10-person SMB), the same API costs about €48 per month, or €576 per year. A dedicated workstation with an RTX 4070 pays for itself in roughly two to three years, and after that hardware refresh cycle the marginal cost is electricity.
For 50 hours per week or more — larger teams, agencies with lots of client calls, consulting firms — local Whisper on a shared GPU workstation is substantially cheaper and keeps all the data on premises. A €1,500 workstation covers the hardware, and a half-day of setup covers the software.
The non-cost factors matter too. Local is the only option that gives you true zero-transfer compliance, which is a selling point when pitching to public-sector or regulated-industry customers. API is the only option that scales elastically without you noticing. A hybrid setup — local for sensitive internal meetings, EU API for overflow and for meetings where collaboration features matter — is what most of our SMB readers settle on by month three.
Checklist: SMB tool selection for 2026 compliance
Before you sign anything, run this ten-point check.
One: Is the vendor’s primary data centre in the EEA, and is that in the DPA, not just in marketing? Two: Does the DPA include an explicit no-training-on-customer-data clause? Three: Is the full sub-processor list available, current, and EU-based (or covered by SCCs plus a Transfer Impact Assessment)? Four: Does the tool support per-tenant retention policies, or at minimum automated deletion after a set period? Five: Can you export and delete all data on demand without a support ticket? Six: Does the consent flow — or your own override — prevent transcription of participants who opt out? Seven: Is there an admin-level switch to disable auto-join for external meetings? Eight: Does the tool expose an audit log of who accessed which transcript? Nine: If the use case is high-risk under the AI Act, does the tool support human review and logging? Ten: If the vendor is US-headquartered, is the EU residency clause specific (country, region), and is there a notification obligation before any change?
A vendor that fails on more than two of these is not ready for an SMB with employees, customers, and audit obligations in 2026. A vendor that passes all ten is a safe choice to sign today.
When should your SMB start?
AI transcription in 2026 is legally safe — if you set up the process cleanly once. Whisper v3 Turbo locally is the bulletproof route with zero GDPR risk, and it is now fast enough on current hardware that the “local is slower” objection has quietly disappeared. EU-hosted APIs like Aleph Alpha, Nota AI, and AssemblyAI’s Frankfurt region are genuinely competitive alternatives for teams that do not want to run GPUs. US tools remain viable on enterprise tiers with specific EU-data-residency clauses, but the bar is higher than it was two years ago, and for most SMBs an EU-native provider is the cheaper and simpler choice.
If you run 15 or more meetings per week: start now. Half a day of tool selection, a two-page policy, a templated DPIA, and a signed DPA are enough to roll out cleanly and save 10–15 hours of minutes-writing per month — for years, without the risk of a compliance finding wiping out the savings.
Sources and further reading
Legal sources and templates rely on the primary documents: the consolidated GDPR text for Articles 5, 6, 9 and 28, the European Data Protection Board for cross-border guidance, and OpenAI Whisper on GitHub for v3 Turbo licensing and model specifications.
Parent overview: AI Audio Tools 2026: Speech Synthesis, Transcription and Dubbing. Related articles: AI speech recognition – everything you need to know, ElevenLabs vs. Murf vs. Play.ht voice cloning comparison.
Update note (as of 15.04.2026)
This guide is reconciled every 4–6 weeks with new GDPR interpretations, EU AI Act implementing acts and Whisper releases. Particular attention in 2026: Whisper v4 (expected H2), new EU data-residency options from US providers and potential clarifications from German supervisory authorities on the high-risk status of meeting-transcription systems. Next review: early June 2026.
Related articles
Our central articles on Artificial Intelligence at a glance — sorted chronologically.
practice-use-casesAI for Small Businesses 2026 — 7 Use Cases with Concrete ROI
Which AI applications pay off for small and medium businesses in 2026? Seven proven use cases with time savings, cost and implementation effort.
guides-tutorialsAI Image Generation 2026: Market Overview, Models and Pro Workflow
The complete overview of AI image generation in 2026: Midjourney v7, Stable Diffusion, DALL·E 3, Flux and Ideogram compared — with workflow recommendations and license notes.
guides-tutorialsAI Audio Tools 2026: Speech Synthesis, Transcription and Dubbing Overview
The complete overview of AI audio tools in 2026: speech synthesis (TTS), speech recognition (STT), voice cloning and dubbing — with tool recommendations, pricing and GDPR guidance.
guides-tutorialsPrompt Engineering 2026 – The Complete Guide for Professional AI Use
The practical guide to Prompt Engineering 2026 — techniques, frameworks, examples and templates for ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AI transcription of meetings even allowed in Germany?
Yes, but only with explicit consent of all participants. Covert recording violates §201 StGB (word recording), GDPR Art. 6 and telecommunications secrecy. Consent must be documented (chat message, email, meeting minutes).
Which AI transcription tools are GDPR-compliant?
Local: OpenAI Whisper, Whisper.cpp, WhisperX (all open source, runs on your machine). Cloud with EU hosting: Otter.ai (with DPA), Deepgram EU, tl;dv. US tools with DPA: Fireflies, Tactiq — but require additional DPA clarification.
Can I just run Whisper on my laptop?
Yes. Whisper is open source (MIT license), runs fully locally. Setup on Mac M1/M2: Whisper.cpp via brew install whisper-cpp (10 min). On Windows: Python + OpenAI Whisper package (20 min). Zero cloud upload, zero GDPR risk.
How good is Whisper for German?
Very good. Whisper v3 Turbo (late 2024) reaches 93–95% word accuracy on clear standard German. On dialects (Bavarian, Saxon) the rate drops to 85–88%. On meetings with 3+ speakers to 90–93%. Perfectly sufficient for business meetings.
What hardware do I need for Whisper locally?
Minimum: Mac M1/M2 or Intel/AMD with 16 GB RAM. The large model (large-v3) needs 10 GB. For live transcription ideally an NVIDIA GPU (RTX 3060+). On M2 Pro: 1-hour meeting transcribed in ~15 min — fast enough for asynchronous workflows.
Which consent texts should I use?
Before the meeting in writing: 'This meeting will be recorded and AI-transcribed to create minutes. The recording will be deleted after 30 days. By participating you consent.' Repeat verbally at the start. Anyone who objects: no recording.
What if a meeting participant does not consent?
No recording. If needed, classic handwritten minutes. Alternatively: meeting without recording, followed by a summary from participants' notes. Consent counts as withdrawn — that must be respected.
Is Whisper local worth it vs. Otter.ai cloud?
Whisper local: €0/mo, maximum privacy, setup effort. Otter.ai: €17/mo Pro, convenience features (live share, collaboration). At 20+ meetings/week, Whisper local costs less long term. For few meetings and time priority: Otter.ai.
